'Green' supply chains are short-sighted, says expert

30 January 2008
More news

30 January 2008 | Paul Snell

Firms are not dealing with the compromises inherent in running a "green" supply chain, according to Adrian Gonzalez, director at supply chain consultancy ARC Advisory Group. In his view, many firms are not addressing the fact that "green" supply chain ideas often have negative, as well as positive, results.

He cited the example of energy saving lightbulbs, which while saving energy and money, also contain mercury. This presents an environmental problem when they need to be disposed of.

"The benefits [of low energy bulbs] far outweigh the negatives," said Gonzalez. "But if these negatives are not recognised and dealt with, are we really making progress?"

He added firms should provide more information about the full impact of their green initiatives.

"Trade-offs exist because most products, manufacturing processes, and supply chains were not designed with sustainability in mind," he said. "Although sustainability is weaving its way into the industrial world, change will occur slowly, so companies and consumers will have to manage those trade-offs for many years to come."


City of London
GBP46 - GBP55000.00 per annum + bonus + package
Bramwith Consulting
GBP30000.00 - GBP38000 per annum +
Bramwith Consulting
CIPS Knowledge
Find out more with CIPS Knowledge:
  • best practice insights
  • guidance
  • tools and templates